What model 1000 is better??

Moderators: Site Director, FZR Forum Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
sbutler
50+ Posts
50+ Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 12:28 am
Location: New south wales ...Australia

What model 1000 is better??

Post by sbutler »

I have been doing a lot of research over the Xmas break, & I have come to the concluion the pre 90 FZR 1000s seem to be better race bikes??
I know they have a cradle under the engine, non USD forks & a different swingarm. But wouldnt time suggest thet as the model moved along Yamaha would have made it better?

To me the first FZRs were real Superbikes, & as the model traveled along its path, they seemed to softern it year by year.
I know the later ones had the EXUP, even that sort of gave them more low/mid power but very little in the way of improvment.

In the first few years the FZR won that many production races I lost count. In fact they were unbeatable for years in most types of racing. But then seemed to drop off the radar somewatt.

Yamaha seemed to be making it a better road bike & a less sporting bike.
Am I off track here, or did Yamaha mean to do this , or infact, are the later FZRs better then the early models as far as racing goes??
Someone inlighten me please. :headscratch: :headscratch:
User avatar
mossy1200
Level 5.0
Level 5.0
Posts: 535
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:27 pm
Location: Wellington New Zealand

Re: What model 1000 is better??

Post by mossy1200 »

1987/88 non exup 135hp 18inch rear wheel 4.5inch wide
1989 first exup 145hp 1000w 17inch rear wheel 5.5inch wide
1990 1000a altered rear sub frame and small changes 145hp
1991 1000b 145hp motor unchanged
1992 1000d usd forks 145hp
1989 to 1992 same wheels so if you end up searching spare set for wets all will fit unmodified.
1987 to 1992 same disc rotors.
I think 1989 onwards will give you good race bike.
1987/88 will need wheel conversions for better tyres and be down some power.

1989 better for me considering post classic class is pre and including 1989 only in New Zealand
1990 is almost same bike 1002cc exup.I think calipers different and subframe mounts but not many other things that will count.

ImageImage

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uR8ZIVit80

89w 1000 on wet track.Loud is better turn it up.
User avatar
sbutler
50+ Posts
50+ Posts
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 12:28 am
Location: New south wales ...Australia

Re: What model 1000 is better??

Post by sbutler »

Mossy can you do me a favor & mesure the distance from the swingare pivot to the rear axle in the centre of adjustment??
Your swingarm looks the same as mine & I think the early models were shorter??
User avatar
mossy1200
Level 5.0
Level 5.0
Posts: 535
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 11:27 pm
Location: Wellington New Zealand

Re: What model 1000 is better??

Post by mossy1200 »

sbutler wrote:Mossy can you do me a favor & mesure the distance from the swingare pivot to the rear axle in the centre of adjustment??
Your swingarm looks the same as mine & I think the early models were shorter??
Hi Butler
The bandit micro shows 1000w 89 has same swinger retained till 1995.89 was the first of this type swinger.
I will messure tonight to confirm.
Late for work.

Cheers Steve
Post Reply